an sms I sent an hour ago has not been delivered.
it's because the messaging app used RCS by default.
I'm not sure why it's set to do so, but I guess nobody would actually use RCS unless it was turned on by default.
nobody cares if a message is sent over RCS or SMS as long as it gets to its destination.
these days, everyone has data on, unless they've turned it off, in which case they probably don't want messages either - so that's an advantage.
wonder what other advantages RCS has.
I assume, unlike MMS, there is no fallback system for RCS (MMS used to send you a SMS with a link as an alternative to downloading the MMS itself on the phone).
so RCS probably is completely carrier independent and should be free/unlimited.
can RCS have a fallback like MMS did?
that would require the messaging client to support it over SMS.
any client side SMS to RCS bridge needs an intelligent client, but there is no guarantee of that. after all, you could be sending a SMS to a 25 year old phone.
25 year old phones are interesting. they had a strange sort of data connectivity, WAP.
I wonder how WAP actually worked. it definitely wasn't regular TCP/IP, and while the pages looked like very basic HTML, I'm sure there was more to it.
I wonder what's the application protocol part of WAP. could there be applications other than a browser on WAP?
MMS is an application, in a sense.
If there could be other applications on WAP, I wonder why I never heard of them.
I'm sure if there was a way to use WAP to chat, yahoo and msn messenger would have developed an app.
man, yahoo and msn messenger on WAP was crazy!
remember hitting refresh every 5 seconds to check for new messages? and the contact list that sorted itself by time seen, with online, idle and finally offline sections?
I think there would be an asterisk next to the name of the contact who had an unread message waiting for me.
unvisited links would be blue. visited, magenta.
I wonder how big each page was. definitely under a kilobyte. but they still took time to load!
I guess mobile Internet was so slow and limited back then that there was no point counting data. if you could find a way to use more than what would be considered fair, knock yourself out!
it's so hard to come to terms with that until WiFi came to phones in 2008, the only way in was via mobile networks.
2008 is not that long ago. broadband was pretty fast. MP3s were 10 years old. YouTube existed! and yet the only way to get something on your phone was mobile data or the memory card/USB port. and only data could be realistically called online communication.
it's now November 2023. so that was 15 years ago. my second phone.
my first phone was purchased in February 2004!
i wonder what was the date I purchased it. it definitely deserves a commemorative blog post. 20 years of smartphones!
I know exactly where it would be. my old blog!
ah, my old blog. back when I blogged and nobody read it because nobody around me knew what a blog was.
it's so much easier to blog now.
I miss my old school, hand-crafted blog.
I don't need to miss my old school, hand-crafted blog.
I am going to revive my old school, hand-crafted blog!
I wonder if it'll be safe to run ASP on a windows 2000 VM and expose it via my dynamic DNS.
Nope, definitely won't be safe!
Let's just stick with old school and forget about hand-crafted.
If it's a good platform, I should be able to import all my old posts into the new blog.
wouldn't it look weird? a post a day (or a couple a week) from 2003 to 2006, and then suddenly we jump to December 2023?
actually, it won't be weird. I'm sure I'm still almost the same.
I should take the images from the original website and stick them on the blog though.
"welcome to Kristopher's corner of the world wide web" - it doesn't get more late 90s corny than that!
I remember the font. my favourite font.
did the font make Kristopher look like krist0ph3r?
if it did, I now know where I got my inspiration from.
I must blog this on my main blog.